, ,

  • A  A  A  A  
Link copied

Republicans are one of the two major political parties in America. So despite their dogmatism rooted in bad faith, rampant unprofessionalism, racism, misogyny, and just general autistic like cringeworthyness—which according to John Bolton’s book is really emanating (at least in large part) from their being under duress from the Chinese aristocracy—their purported public positions matter to us, and must continue to matter to us for as long as they continue to have the ability to pass new laws. One of those purported positions that is very troubling, to put it mildly, is their suggesting that every time a woman gets pregnant, whether she wants to or not, she should have no choice but to bear the child; “pro-life,” they call it. It’s my belief that that purported position is absolute insanity, and with this article I aim to completely deride it by clearly articulating the logical absurdity, misogyny and inherent antipathy towards women of it, and put this “debate” to rest once and for all.

The antipathy towards women and failure to recognize how much time, effort and pain goes into bearing a child

“Pro-lifers” implore women to “please just see the pregnancy all the way through and when the baby pops out, if you don’t want it (which they are sure that she will) just put it up for adoption,” and imply that the root cause of a woman wanting to get an abortion is just her not being able to to see the big picture. The reality that anybody with a sliver of emotional intelligence can recognize is that an immense amount of time, effort and pain goes into taking a child from conception to birth, and that from the moment she gets that positive pregnancy test, a woman knows whether or not she wants to have a child with the man who impregnated her. Imagine if someone asked you to do High Interval Intensity Training workouts for 4-5 days a week for two years to be in the exact same shape you’re in right now, or to train to get a black belt in Taekwondo but get none of the skills …and implored you to do so as your “moral imperative.” 

Trying to subvert autonomy and freedom over peoples’ bodies under the guise of appeasing religious fanatics

What really was “COVID-19?” The short answer is that it was an attempted coup, the true aim of which is unfathomable for the vast majority of whom are not at least modestly well read in history. The cold, hard truth is that there are people—at the helm of our central banks, who want to enslave us, or subvert freedom, as they would put it. They are misguided, highly troubled individuals, and the root cause of their antipathy towards other humans is psychopathy and messed up dopamine triggers. Unfortunately for them, and for us right now, they are in a position where they have a lot of influence over our institutions and the largest corporations in our society. Republicans purport to be pandering to religious fanatics in their suggesting that every time a woman gets pregnant, whether she wants to or not, she should have no choice but to bear the child, but the reality is that they are all being controlled by these individuals through their chief of staffs (and have been since before Regan), and that this suggestion represents their trying to get a foot in the door on the broader suppression of all freedom and slavery by starting off with this major freedom applicable to 50% of the population of the world in the country that has the largest economy in the world and where Freedom is enshrined in their constitution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our journalism is powered by readers like you.

Contribute to our mission to help vitalize journalism and permanently eradicate corruption in world politics.